Monday, April 13, 2009
The Lover
This is a reflection on our untraditional class structure and my particular group's work. We looked at the idea of the feminine style of writing and how it changed women's voice in literature. I have never read anything by Maragarite Duras, and I thought that this gave a great introduction to her work! The fragmented way in which she writes gives her the power to have the reader know exactly how she feels in an instance, vividly. For a woman on her deathbed able to conjure up these images and feeling in the reader is truly admirable. While many stories chronologically build up a feeling or instance, Duras is able to catch the reader off guard, which makes the literature much more effective. It gives women a voice for their emotions, but they are legitimate because the emotions are presented so rationally. However, to me, her rationality almost makes her seem crazy, that she exaggerates things. But maybe I just want that to make me feel better about what is happening in the story.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I liked the authors random eclectic style as well. it seems as though readers' opinions are fairly hit and missed regarding her work and post -modern style. I don't think a story needs chronology, i think its lack of actually adds to the story, makes it more memorable and encourages the reader to follow her work more closely to gain the same understanding. it encourages us to concentrate harder. a more straight forward style would not encourage any of this, it would only encourage the same old skimming, blah reading we are used to. Ive enjoyed my introduction to Duras work, as it seems you have as well
ReplyDelete